Now that we are all here, l would like to bring to your attention a thought one of l had when proofreading our first post. This thought - resplendid in the light of the day it was hatched (the day of the fool – Ed.) – revolved squarely (hmm can one revolve in a square fashion? I’m sure one could however ‘revolve’ generally involves a circular, or in the case of the inebriated, elliptical fashion) around the word, myself. The word myself by itself leapt from the screen like a digital, literary tiger or some other predatory assembly of letters for two reasons. The first l have illustrated within the first few words of this very paragraph! Look and l will see the oddity of referring to myself as itself. Why is it odd l can hear myself ask. Well, l shall explain to me. The word itself refers to the first instance of myself from my original post, whom is indeed my good self. However in this experiment the word myself is referring to a singular and previous instance thus making this myself not refer to my good self but simply a reference to a piece of wordage, which as I’ll agree is entirely devoid of a self. So, following this hastily invented logic, we can then draw the line to the word itself being out of place as it itself (itself) is referring to the selfless myself so the self in itself is redundant and in fact selfless itself. This is but one of the reasons this word popped out at us.
The second reason l found myself telling myself about the word myself is quite simple.
It sounds like mice elf.
